Technology - Google News

OnePlus teases ‘moonshot’ announcement for March 8th - The Verge
Switching from MacBook to Chromebook: A year later - Android Police
Apple's ProRaw is why I reach for my iPhone and not my Google Pixel - CNET

OnePlus teases ‘moonshot’ announcement for March 8th - The Verge

Posted: 01 Mar 2021 05:29 AM PST

OnePlus CEO Pete Lau is teasing a "moonshot" announcement on March 8th, when the company expected to reveal details about its next flagship smartphone, the OnePlus 9. "Something new is on the horizon" a teaser site reads, alongside a photograph that looks an awful lot like the famous "Earthrise" photograph from the Apollo 8 mission. That photo was taken with a Hasselblad camera, the 180-year-old Swedish company rumored to be partnering with OnePlus on its upcoming phones.

In the past, manufacturers have also used photographs of the Moon to advertise the capabilities of their phones' zoom cameras for astrophotography, indicating that this could be a key feature of the OnePlus 9 lineup.

The tease comes days after tipster Ishan Agarwal told 91Mobiles that the company would be announcing three new smartphones — the OnePlus 9, 9 Pro, and 9R — and a smartwatch in mid-March. According to tipster Max Jambor, the company will announce the launch date of the OnePlus 9 series on March 8th.

Other rumors about the upcoming OnePlus 9 Pro include wireless fast charging at 45W. The step-down OnePlus 9 is expected to have a flat 6.55-inch 120Hz 1080p display, according to Android Authority, while the 9 Pro will reportedly have a 6.78-inch 120Hz 1440p display. Both phones are expected to be powered by Qualcomm's Snapdragon 888 processor. A third phone, rumored to be called either the OnePlus 9R or OnePlus 9 Lite, could also be announced with an older Snapdragon 865 processor, Android Central reports.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Switching from MacBook to Chromebook: A year later - Android Police

Posted: 01 Mar 2021 08:09 AM PST

This story was originally published 2020/04/26
8:00am PDTon Apr 26, 2020 and last updated 2021/03/01
8:09am PSTon Mar 1, 2021.

A year ago, I decided to retire my aging 2013 MacBook Air in favor of an HP Chromebook x360. I haven't turned my back on Apple completely and I'm still using a 2019 iMac at my desk, but for my mobile needs (well, more like working-from-the-kitchen-table needs given the pandemic), I've been using my Chromebook. Chrome OS changed quite a bit since I got the machine, and there are a lot of features I genuinely enjoy, but there's still a few little things that itch me enough that make me want to switch back to a MacBook.

To provide some context, here are the devices I threw into the mix: I use a 27-inch iMac with 40GB of RAM and a 9th-gen 3.7GHz 6-core Intel Core i5 at my desk while my old MacBook was running on 4GB of RAM and an aging 4th-gen dual-core Core i5. My Chromebook is a 14-inch HP Chromebook x360 with 8GB of RAM and an 8th-gen dual-core Intel Core i3 (Taylor reviewed a similarly equipped variant here at Android Police).

Design and hardware

It isn't fair to compare the build quality of a $1,000+ computer to one I got for about $500, but considering the price difference and the resulting compromises in design and material, the Chromebook holds up surprisingly well. That's mostly thanks to HP's excellent keyboard and the laptop's sturdy exterior — I still do have my gripes with the weight and the relatively dark screen with its 16:9 form factor (I prefer 3:2). The touchpad isn't too great, either, but it's serviceable. I guess there's a reason MacBook trackpads are considered to be industry-leading.

I'm pretty happy that Chrome OS recently introduced a three-finger swipe-up gesture to access the overview screen, making multitasking much easier for me as someone who relies on Mission Control on Mac. The Chromebook's left and right three-finger swipe gesture to switch between tabs is also just perfect, though I don't find myself using it as often as I initially thought I would.

While I despise Google's decision to replace caps lock with a search key instead of putting it in the Windows or command key's place, I do like having dedicated browsing buttons at the top of the keyboard. And by now, I've got my go-to keyboard shortcuts like Search + left/right to go to the end or beginning of a line engraved in my memory.

The HP Chromebook x360 in tent mode.

I had hoped I could use this flippable Chromebook as a tablet replacement, but I've found myself using it in laptop mode 99% of the time, even when I'm consuming content. A 14-inch device is just too huge to be a tablet, even with Google's improvements to touchscreen-only usage. And even the space-saving tent mode isn't what I hoped it would be, since its advantage is moot due to the speaker placement — they fire backward when in tent mode. It certainly doesn't help that the speakers among the weakest I've got on any of my devices.

If you've ever run Chrome on macOS, you know how taxing Google's software is on battery life. On Chromebooks, that's not the case at all.

When I first started using the Chromebook, I found the touchscreen incredibly convenient for tapping icons on the taskbar to launch apps and some other interactions, but over the last few months, I barely touch the screen anymore. It's just not comfortable to reach all the way to the display when I can just use keyboard shortcuts or the touchpad. I probably wouldn't miss the convertible aspect or the touchscreen on a new machine at all.

If you've ever run Chrome on macOS (or Windows, for that matter), you know how taxing Google's software is on battery life. On my Chromebook, I didn't feel like that was the case at all. Despite dozens of tabs and a multitude of windows, my machine keeps going. Things get more complicated once I start throwing Android and Linux apps into the mix. I feel like battery life gets worse, though that's purely anecdotal, and others on the AP team don't feel that way. But a performance hit wouldn't be too surprising since the OS runs both Android and Linux in virtual machines, which translates to more work for the processor. This leads us right to the next section.

Android, Linux, and the web

Android and Linux apps on Chrome OS require little to no code adjustments, which is great for getting lots of apps on Chromebooks but not so great for usability.

Left: 100% scaling. Right: 90% scaling. Zoom in and look at the text, you can tell the difference.

Android apps already feel like second-class citizens due to restricted file access, spell-checking limitations, and some issues with keyboard localization, and that impression gets worse once you introduce display size scaling. On my Chromebook's standard 100% 864 x 1536 scaling, Android apps look just as pristine as websites and Linux applications, but when you prefer using a less dense scaling like, say, the native 1920 x 1080 at 80%, apps get comically small, text looks fuzzy, and it's generally harder to interact with them. Google is already working on improvements, but there are a ton of problems that need solving before the new Android app scaling method will launch in stable.

While I'm grateful that I can download Netflix, Amazon Prime, and Disney+ shows on the Chromebook via the respective Android apps, the former streaming services limit video quality to SD, which is something neither Google nor Netflix or Amazon have seen fit to solve over the last year.

On the Linux side, things are looking better, which is probably because Chrome OS itself is based on the open-source operating system. I could easily replace my macOS image editor of choice, Pixelmator Pro, with GIMP, and while I still have some trouble navigating the open-source tool at times, it works well enough for me, especially once I activated Linux file sharing on my storage.

When it comes to text editing, I'm still stuck in limbo. I rely on Microsoft OneDrive for cloud storage, and OneDrive and Chrome OS don't play together nicely. In contrast to Google Drive and Dropbox, which can be integrated with the Chrome OS Files app for read and write access, OneDrive is stuck with read-only. That's why I have to rely on the OneDrive website for file management, which is far from ideal. I experimented with syncing OneDrive via a third-party tool, but it's not the same as a proper native integration. I was on the fence about switching to Google Drive, but I enjoy that Microsoft gives me access to its Office apps and 1TB of cloud storage at a fraction of the price I'd pay for Drive storage.

My OneDrive situation is also why I decided not to use LibreOffice for editing my Microsoft Office files. I'm sticking with the online version of Word and Co. so I don't have to keep downloading and uploading files to save changes. But there are still some missing features compared to the Mac version: I can't print envelopes in Word, and links to files in Excel documents don't work in the online version, both of which I rely on regularly.

I tried doing my script reading and annotating on my Chromebook, but I've given up.

When I'm not writing for Android Police, I work as a script reader for a German TV channel, and I had high hopes in the Chromebook's touchscreen for annotating PDF files. While the 14-inch touchscreen could be perfect for reading scripts in portrait mode, it ultimately failed to meet my expectations. I just couldn't find an app or web service that perfectly fit my annotation needs, and I tried lots of them. There was just nothing that could come close to the excellent PDF Expert reader on macOS and iOS with native OneDrive syncing capabilities.

Missing my macOS apps and utilities

After settling for my word and image processing tools, I noticed that I missed some of my favorite Mac utilities. But Google has been working hard on improving Chrome OS over the last year and introduced some native features that can replace a few of these. The company has enhanced the launcher search with handy links to files, folders, settings, websites, apps, and more, copying my third-party Spotlight replacement Alfred that supercharges my productivity and file finding game on macOS. Google has also introduced a clipboard manager on the beta channel that helps when I juggle multiple links while researching stories, and I could replace Alfred's snippet feature that automatically expands text when I type in a keyword with the TextBlaze browser extension.

But there are some native Mac features that I haven't been able to replicate on Chrome OS properly. It's a bummer I can't batch-rename files, and even fundamentals like cluttering my desktop with files and folders are still impossible to do on Google's OS for some reason. And let's not mention video editing.

There are things that I prefer on Chrome OS, though, like the task switching behavior on alt + tab that shuffles through all windows instead of applications like on macOS. In fact, I'm using Contexts on my Mac to make app switching feel more like it does on Windows, Linux, and Chrome OS. And I absolutely love the Chrome OS holding space that shows me recent downloads, screen captures, and pinned files in a dedicated place in the taskbar (this is still in beta, though).

Ecosystem integration

Apart from Instant Tethering and the usual data saved to my Google account, I haven't gotten too much of an ecosystem advantage out of my switch to Chrome OS. Sure, I could use Google Drive to sync files across my phone and my Chromebook, and I could see my text messages on Messages' web interface if I didn't use Signal, but that's also possible on other desktop OSs.

Android and Chrome OS don't work together too well.

Compared to Apple's excellent ecosystem advantages when you use both macOS and iOS or even Microsoft's Your Phone app for Windows and Android, Chrome OS is still lagging behind, but Google is working on improving the situation with the Phone Hub.

A mockup of Phone Hub.

I haven't received the new Chrome OS Phone Hub yet (it's currently rolling out), but it looks like it will change things quite considerably. It supercharges the existing cross-device options and will allow you to see your phone's notifications and Chrome tabs. It'll also let you enable the hotspot, silence your phone, and locate your device from your Chromebook. Google is even working on bringing phone screen mirroring to the OS, which I look forward to — though I must say, I'm not sure how badly I want deeper phone integration as I try to leave my phone out of reach when I don't need it for screenshots or tests.

Verdict

While I still don't feel 100% at home on Chrome OS, Google has done a ton to improve the experience over the last year, and I got used to a lot of things and found workarounds for others. Chrome OS is definitely worth a look if your workflow mainly involves the web and some lighter Linux tools.

But to me, Chrome OS still doesn't feel like a full-fledged operating system at times, and once you need more advanced tools than what's built-in, things can get complicated easily. Turning on the Linux partition and installing apps requires some advanced knowledge or some diving into and might not be for everyone — it would be great if Google could build a Play Store-like experience for Linux apps, but I'm not sure if that's something the company is even interested in.

If I could make a wishlist of features I'd love to see over the next year, I'd add better scaling for Android apps, an option to rename multiple files at once, a desktop I can clutter up with my files, a PDF annotation tool I can work with, and some proper OneDrive integration (a wish addressed to Microsoft).

In the initial version of this editorial, I said that I would stick with the Chromebook for now, but that I might pick up a new MacBook in the long term. Now that Apple has announced its first pair of ARM-powered MacBooks, I'm looking very closely at the MacBook Pro and might pick one up to replace both my iMac and Chromebook.

One year later

The article has been updated to reflect my experience a year after switching to a Chromebook.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Apple's ProRaw is why I reach for my iPhone and not my Google Pixel - CNET

Posted: 01 Mar 2021 05:00 AM PST

The flexibility of Apple's ProRaw photo format let me show the shadow details in this backlit cactus without blowing out the colors of the bright dawn sky.

Stephen Shankland/CNET

Apple's new ProRaw photo format has turned me into an iPhone guy.

I still love my Google Pixel. But more and more often, I reach for my iPhone 12 Max Pro when taking a shot. Its telephoto camera, which sits alongside wide angle and ultrawide cameras, is a big draw. The control the ProRaw format gives me when I edit my shots, however, is the key to my shifting photography habits.

The new ProRaw technology lets me achieve a look that's more pleasing and natural than I can get with the standard JPEG or HEIC photos most camera phones produce. That's important for both my nature and family photos.

Read: CNET's in-depth review of Apple ProRaw

The new format gives Apple an edge after a decade in which its once-superior iPhone cameras lost ground to Google, whose image-processing software dramatically improved smartphone photography. Apple's investments in photography should help keep iPhone customers loyal -- especially the creative types Apple loves to showcase in its ads -- even as companies like Samsung try to win us over with features like big-zoom telephoto cameras.

Google led the way but lost the lead

Google deserves credit for pioneering computational photography techniques that compensate for the shortcomings of smartphone cameras. It's made smartphones a better option for photography enthusiasts, like me, who are accustomed to lugging around a DSLR.

One of my favorite Google technologies is called computational raw, a direct competitor to ProRaw that beat Apple to the market by two years with the Pixel 3 release. It's key to wringing out of tiny phone sensors more image quality than I thought would ever be possible.

The ProRaw image to the left offers a natural view of the Sangre de Cristo Mountains at sunset. On the corresponding JPEG, the mountains look overprocessed and unrealistic.

Stephen Shankland/CNET

Apple began offering ProRaw with the iPhone 12 Pro and 12 Pro Max in 2020. That's when Google scaled back its photography ambitions, betting that people would prefer a good value over a pricey flagship phone during the coronavirus pandemic. Google's Pixel 5 has just wide and ultrawide cameras; the iPhone 12 Pro models sport wide, ultrawide and telephoto cameras.

The iPhone 12 Pro models start at $999 compared with the Pixel 5's more modest $699 price tag. The Pixel 5 is a good choice for plenty of people. I just happen to be someone who needs a telephoto camera, in particular the 2.5X zoom in the iPhone 12 Pro Max, whose price starts at $1,099.

Apple's ProRaw works just fine with its 2.5X optical zoom. In contrast, Google's computational raw suffers from lower resolution when used with the Pixel's Super-Res Zoom magnification trick. I'm interested in the 3X and 10X zoom cameras on Samsung's new Galaxy S21 Ultra, but Samsung doesn't enable the ability to capture raw images from those cameras.

Why ProRaw is good

The biggest advantage of ProRaw is that it offers photographers more of the flexibility they're used to with higher-end SLR and mirrorless cameras from the likes of Sony, Nikon and Canon. To create a compact JPEG or HEIC, a camera throws out image information it doesn't think you'll need. Shooting raw keeps more of that original data. Apple, like Google, packages the raw data using Adobe's flexible DNG (Digital Negative) image format.

I started shooting raw with my DSLR years ago to get better control over exposure and color. I was looking for the ability to fine-tune shadow detail, brighten highlights and fix color casts according to my taste rather than my camera's guesswork.

Apple's ProRaw, like Google's computational raw, gives me that freedom but with smartphone photography. Ordinary raw photos from a smartphone are limited by the data captured in a single image. ProRaw, though, marries multiple frames into a single shot with Apple's Smart HDR to offer a wider span from bright to shadow and more tonal detail than a JPEG or HEIC. (The technical term for that is dynamic range.) And it applies Apple's Deep Fusion technology, a pixel-by-pixel analysis of each shot to reduce noise while preserving texture and color. ProRaw gives me the flexibility to preserve more of both the brilliant sky and deep shadows of sunset scenes.

The second benefit is color flexibility. Cameras struggle to judge how best to compensate for tints like the deep blue of shadowed scenes or the warm oranges of sunrise and sunset. ProRaw preserves more color information, allowing me to warm up the tones of someone's shadowed face so it doesn't look like hypothermia has set in.

For this photo of a cholla cactus, I prefer the ProRaw version, lower left, to the JPEG above it. More significantly, pushing the white balance toward yellow and blue shows how much more color information the ProRaw shots on the bottom have for editing flexibility.

Stephen Shankland/CNET

Another big advantage of ProRaw involves the sharpening algorithms all cameras employ to make edges crisp and eyes sparkle. I find Apple's sharpening often goes too far, turning busy scenes like a tangle of branches into a jittery mess. When I edit a ProRaw image, I can dial that down.

For a lot more detail, check my colleague Andrew Hoyle's deeper look at how ProRaw can improve your phone photography.

My ProRaw gripes

I don't mind that Apple hides ProRaw mode until you specifically enable it. Most people don't have the time or need to fool with photos as much as I and other raw photo fans do. I also am happy that another preference lets you set your iPhone to stay in ProRaw mode once you've engaged it. (By default, the phone switches back to JPEG shortly after you're done taking ProRaw photos.)

What I don't like is squinting at my phone screen in bright sunlight to check the icon that indicates whether ProRaw is enabled. A few times, I disabled it with my thumb and missed shots that should have been ProRaw.

I'd prefer that Apple, like Google, would record both a computational raw photo and a JPEG of each shot. Apple opted for what it deems to be a simpler either-or interface, but I prefer the flexibility.

In this shot of the Rio Grande, Apple's ProRaw format, left, captured depth that I found missing on the JPEG to the right. I also was able to reproduce the warmer sunset colors lost in the JPEG when the iPhone default processing tried to give me a blue sky.

Stephen Shankland/CNET

One reason I still reach for my Pixel 5 sometimes is that its camera launches almost instantly with a double tap on the power button, a process that can begin when the phone is still in my pocket. The iPhone requires a long press on the lock screen's camera icon, which is slower.

Still, the flexibility of ProRaw combined with the range of the iPhone 12 Pro's three cameras is why it's almost always the first phone I grab when it's time to photograph a nature scene, my kids or other subjects. It's great that smartphones are steadily encroaching on the turf once held exclusively by higher-end cameras.

If you're happy with JPEG and HEIC shots straight out of the phone's regular camera, I won't think less of you. You often can get good photos without ProRaw. But if you want more out of your photos, ProRaw delivers the goods.

The relatively broad dynamic range of Apple's ProRaw format let me reveal shadow details in this challenging shot looking toward the sun. At left is the unedited shot.

Stephen Shankland/CNET

Let's block ads! (Why?)