Technology - Google News |
- Apple MacBook Air M2 storage speed testing: yup, it's slow - The Verge
- The Twitter app has a new chirp sound - The Verge
- Nothing OS walkthrough: How close is it to Google’s Pixel flavor? [Video] - 9to5Google
Apple MacBook Air M2 storage speed testing: yup, it's slow - The Verge Posted: 15 Jul 2022 02:13 PM PDT Previously, a number of reviewers have reported that Apple's entry-level M2 MacBook Pro's SSD is significantly slower than that of the M1 MacBook Pro due to the configuration of the storage models in the computer. Apple confirmed to The Verge that the base M2 MacBook Air has the same storage configuration as the Pro, so, naturally, we've been wondering if it would suffer from the same issue. Well, we've finally gotten our hands on a base model (including 256GB of storage and 8GB of memory) and the answer is: yes, it does. Going by the results we're seeing in Blackmagic's Disk Speed Test app, the base model of the M2 MacBook Air has write speeds that are generally 15 to 30 percent slower than those of the 512GB model Apple sent The Verge to review — and read speeds that can be 40 to 50 percent slower. This is not an unexpected result since the base Air only includes a single NAND chip, while the M1 models and 512GB (and up) M2 models have two, which can allow for nearly twice as fast speeds. While I wouldn't go so far as to say the speeds we're seeing from this base MacBook Air are bad, they are (especially when it comes to reading data) the kind of speeds you can easily get on laptops that are a bit more, well, meh. For example, the base model is only a bit faster than my 2019 Intel MacBook Pro when it comes to write speeds, and its read speeds are significantly worse. To pick a Windows machine out of a hat, Microsoft's Surface Laptop Go 2 (which starts at $600) also loses to the base Air on write but demolishes it on read. (Read speeds are generally more important for general usage, measuring how fast your device can access files on its system.) We didn't have an M1 Air with 256GB to test, but the 512GB model we do have on hand is also faster than the base M2 model on both read and write, as you can see in the results below. As Verge editor Dan Seifert explains in his review of the M2 Air, slower storage speeds can impact a number of tasks, including file transfers, and can also slow down overall performance since Macs use SSD space as temporary memory (swap memory) when their onboard RAM is used up. That said, will these particular differences impact you? People the Air is marketed to will likely not see a life-changing contrast between the 256GB and 512GB models when it comes to everyday performance. I ran two 4K YouTube videos over 25 open Chrome tabs for 30 minutes on both machines without either needing to dip into swap memory. Boot time was also pretty identical — I turned the two devices on side by side a number of times. And I didn't see much of a difference when it came to opening any of the apps I normally use, including Chrome, Safari, Messages, Photos, Activity Monitor, Slack, Music, etc. For the MacBook Pro's target audience, though, a limitation like this could be a deal-breaker. If you're someone with a heavier workload (who very well may notice a difference), we generally recommend that you buy a MacBook Pro with an M1 Pro or Max chip instead of an Air. That said, these results certainly will matter to some people. If you're in that camp, you'll need to pay $200 to upgrade from 256GB to 512GB, bringing the eight-core M2 MacBook Air's price from $1,199 to $1,399. If that seems like a lot, you can also get 512GB of storage and 8GB of RAM in the still-excellent M1 MacBook Air for $1,199 (the same price as the base M2 Air). My real-world comparisons have found that M2 machines are visibly better for graphics-heavy use cases (such as running games) but that their performance differences are not hugely impactful in other tasks (photo and audio editing, internet work, etc.) that a casual user might do. We've reached out to Apple for comment on these specific results and haven't received a response yet. When we asked the company about the different storage configurations for our review of the device, spokesperson Michelle Del Rio provided the following statement:
|
The Twitter app has a new chirp sound - The Verge Posted: 15 Jul 2022 02:38 PM PDT A few of us at The Verge have noticed something new about Twitter's iOS app: when you pull down to refresh your feed, you might hear a couple of new noises. One is a little windup trill that plays when you first pull the feed, and after your feed is done refreshing, you might hear a short confirmation chirp. (Though the sounds are more robotic than any real-life bird I've heard.) I made a recording so you can hear what I'm hearing. It's a little different from the short "pop" you might have heard when refreshing before. We're not exactly sure when the change kicked in, but we first noticed it Friday afternoon, and we've seen a bunch of tweets about the new chirp from Friday as well. There are also a handful of tweets mentioning a chirp over the past couple of weeks, which could mean that Twitter has been rolling it out slowly ahead of a bigger release. This seemingly isn't an iOS-only change. One Verge staffer on Android is occasionally hearing the second new noise I described, and a few of the tweets I've found about the chirp were sent from Android. If you want to hear the noise for yourself on your phone, just try pulling down to refresh your feed. If you don't hear it, try force closing the Twitter app and opening it again (this is what worked for me), and make sure you're on the latest version of the app. We're not sure how widely this is rolled out, so you may not have the sounds just yet even if you try those steps. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to refresh the app to hear the lovely new sounds again. And again. Maybe just one more time. Last time, I promise... |
Nothing OS walkthrough: How close is it to Google’s Pixel flavor? [Video] - 9to5Google Posted: 15 Jul 2022 02:01 AM PDT Very few Android phones stay close to AOSP these days, and while the Nothing Phone (1) won't come to the US, it's an interesting first entry for Carl Pei's startup. Sold as clean and lightweight, just what is different in Nothing OS? Here's everything you need to know. While there are similarities, Nothing OS contains a few key tweaks to take advantage of the unique design and hardware on this brand-new Android entrant. There are certainly a few hints of early OxygenOS here that might have former OnePlus fans looking at the GV-backed brand. Table of contentsVideo — Nothing OS full walkthroughSubscribe to 9to5Google on YouTube for more videos Pre-installed appsNothing OS is a very light skin atop Android 12, and you are likely happy to hear that bloat or pre-installed apps are kept to an absolute minimum.
Quick settingsSome of the most notable changes within Nothing OS over the Google Pixel series are found in the drop-down Quick Settings section or Notification Shade.
As spotted in the Nothing Launcher Beta ahead of launch, there are a number of widgets designed based upon the Dot Matrix aestethic cultivated by Nothing since the launch of the Ear (1) earbuds.
SettingsThe Settings section of Nothing OS includes some minor alterations to accommodate some of the added hardware features.
Material You and customizationNot all Android skins support Google's wider Material You and Dynamic Color changes right away even after updating to Android 12. Nothing OS supports both core components within Android 12 right out of the box.
CameraOf course, the Nothing Phone (1) camera needs an application and so Nothing OS includes a fairly standard suite of photography and videography options right out of the box. The dual camera setup consists of a 50-megapixel Sony IMX 766 main sensor and 50-megapixel Samsung JN1 ultrawide.
Display
Glyph interfaceThe most striking and biggest selling point of the Nothing Phone (1) is the "Glyph" lighting bands under the transparent glass panel at the back of the device. You cannot fully customize the lighting but, instead, use preset patterns for individual apps or contacts.
What do you think of Nothing OS?It's not often we see new Android skins arrive with new brand-new companies being just as rare. Should Nothing OS continue to adopt an AOSP-like design and aesthetic? Or would you like to see more tuning and adjustments to tailor the hardware? Do you like what you see so far? Let us know down in the comments section below. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Technology - Latest - Google News. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
This post have 0 komentar
EmoticonEmoticon